Why Wellness Stipends Don't Reduce Burnout (And What Does)

The corporate wellness market hit $68 billion in 2025. Employee burnout hit record highs in the same year. These two facts should not coexist -- but they do.

Gallup's 2024 State of the Global Workplace report found that 41% of employees worldwide experience significant daily stress, with the U.S. and Canada at 49%. Meanwhile, Deloitte's Workplace Well-Being Survey reports that 77% of professionals have experienced burnout at their current job.

Companies are spending more on employee wellbeing than ever before. Employees are burning out more than ever before. Something in the model is broken.

The thesis: Wellness stipends are the corporate equivalent of "thoughts and prayers." They outsource wellbeing to individuals while preserving the work conditions that cause burnout. Real burnout reduction requires changing how work happens -- not subsidizing recovery from it.

The Wellness Stipend Illusion

Here is the standard playbook. A company sees rising burnout in engagement surveys. Leadership approves a wellness stipend -- $50 to $100 per month per employee for gym memberships, meditation apps, or therapy sessions. The initiative gets announced in an all-hands. HR checks the box. Burnout persists.

This is not speculation. The NBER's Illinois Workplace Wellness Study -- one of the largest randomized controlled trials of workplace wellness programs ever conducted -- tracked nearly 5,000 employees over two years. The result: no significant effects on physical health outcomes, medical spending, absenteeism, or productivity. The 95% confidence intervals ruled out 84% of the positive effects claimed by previous observational studies.

The programs looked great in press releases. They did almost nothing in practice.

Why Stipends Don't Work

1. They Shift Responsibility to the Individual

Wellness stipends assume burnout is an individual problem with individual solutions. But Gallup's data tells a different story: workers cite workload (47%), understaffing (37%), and poor leadership (40%) as their top stressors. No amount of yoga classes will fix a manager who sends emails at midnight.

When you give someone $75/month to "take care of themselves," the implicit message is that their burnout is their problem to solve. It is not. Burnout is an organizational design failure, not a personal resilience failure.

2. Utilization Rates Are Abysmal

Most wellness benefits go unused. According to Deloitte's workplace wellbeing research, 68% of workers do not use the full value of their wellbeing resources because accessing them is too time-consuming, confusing, or cumbersome.

This tracks with what we know about meditation app retention. Give someone a Headspace subscription through a stipend and 95.3% of them will abandon it within 30 days. Not because they don't want to feel less stressed -- because individual-willpower-dependent programs fail at a structural level. The stipend purchased access to a tool. It did not create the conditions for anyone to actually use it.

3. They Don't Touch Root Causes

Stipends treat symptoms. The causes -- unsustainable workloads, always-on culture, poor management -- remain untouched. It is like offering free umbrellas to people who work in a building with a leaking roof. Technically helpful. Fundamentally unserious.

The Wellness Washing Problem

Employees have noticed. A 2024 Deloitte and Workplace Intelligence study found that 55% of employees believe their employer overestimates how healthy the work environment actually is. And 43% fear negative consequences if they disclose a mental health condition -- even at companies with robust "wellness" programs.

Almost 70% of employees in Gallup's survey said their employer is not doing enough to prevent or alleviate burnout. This is not an awareness gap. It is a credibility gap.

When leadership announces a wellness stipend but does not address the meeting-bloated calendars, the "urgent" Slack pings at 9 PM, or the chronic understaffing -- employees read the signal clearly. The company wants the optics of caring about wellbeing without making the structural changes that would actually deliver it.

What Actually Reduces Burnout

If individual stipends don't work, what does? The research points to interventions with three specific characteristics.

1. Brief, Not Burdensome

A 2025 JAMA Network Open study from UCSF randomized 1,458 employees and found that just 5-10 minutes of daily practice reduced perceived stress with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 0.85). Burnout specifically dropped with an effect size of 0.39, and work engagement improved -- all sustained at four-month follow-up.

The key finding: participants who practiced 5-10 minutes daily saw greater stress reduction than the overall average. You do not need hour-long retreats. You need consistent, short interventions embedded in the workday.

2. Social, Not Solo

Gallup's research consistently shows that employee engagement is driven by social and team dynamics, not individual tools. People with a "best friend at work" are seven times more likely to be engaged. Wellbeing interventions that include a social component outperform those that rely on individual willpower.

This is why wellness stipends -- which send people off to practice alone -- underperform. A team that pauses together for five minutes creates shared ritual, social accountability, and collective permission to prioritize mental health. An individual with a gym membership creates... a recurring charge they feel guilty about not using.

3. Embedded, Not Extra

The interventions that work are not separate from work. They are part of how work happens. A five-minute team breathing session at the start of a meeting is embedded in workflow. A wellness stipend for an app you use on your own time is additional cognitive load on an already overloaded person.

The UCSF study found that adherence was the key mediator of outcomes. People who actually did the practice got the results. The question is not "what intervention works?" It is "what intervention will people actually do?" And the answer is: the one that does not require them to carve out extra time, extra energy, or extra motivation.

What People Leaders Should Do Instead

If you run People or Culture at a company and you are evaluating your wellness budget, here is the honest assessment:

Stop funding programs that depend on individual employees opting in during their personal time. The utilization data is clear. It does not work at scale.

Start looking at interventions that are brief (under 10 minutes), social (team-based, not solo), and embedded (part of existing meetings and workflows, not a separate to-do).

Audit the actual working conditions that cause burnout. No wellness program -- stipend or otherwise -- can compensate for unsustainable workload expectations, chronic understaffing, or leadership that models always-on behavior.

The companies that will actually reduce burnout in the next three years are not the ones that spend the most on wellness perks. They are the ones that redesign how teams work together -- and build brief recovery into the rhythm of the workday itself.

---

Pauso helps teams build 5-minute mindfulness into their existing calendar meetings -- no app downloads, no individual accounts, no willpower required. See how it works.